|
Post by mladen on Apr 12, 2016 1:04:56 GMT
Hello Ethan,
I'm upgrading my stereo which includes Martin-Logan Sequel 2's, modified for (true) bi-amping & active crossover. My approach is to do common sense things, spend where necessary, avoid silliness and hope it all accumulates into a nice system. So I have a few questions:
1. Being a di-polar radiator, it seems logical to damp the backwave as much as possible and that any "ambiance" comes from later reflections. Logical? Or can any part of the backwave be used constructively? 2. Do speaker floor spikes do anything to improve sound, especially bass? Or only provide a more secure footing on carpet? Do additional weight on speaker + spikes cause any improvement? 3. Does sharp imaging necessarily result in a narrow sweet spot? In other words, is it (theoretically at least) possible to widen the sweet spot and maintain the sharpness? Maybe with three speakers instead of two?
Thank you in advance,
Mladen
|
|
|
Post by Ethan Winer on Apr 12, 2016 16:33:59 GMT
1. Yes, in my opinion the back wave radiation is an unavoidable byproduct of the design rather than a feature. Full-frequency-range reflections off the front wall behind the speakers can only skew the response. 2. As best I can tell spikes are nonsense. I'm certain that isolation is nonsense. It cracks me up when a hi-fi reseller offers both spikes and isolators, with the same description (tighter bass, better imaging, etc). I actually tested loudspeaker isolation a few months ago: Loudspeaker Isolation Tests3. I don't know what "sharp imaging" means. When early reflections are treated the stereo image gets wider and audio clarity improves. --Ethan
|
|