|
|
Post by Hexspa on Jun 15, 2017 4:19:21 GMT
I wasn't mistaking a cubic foot for a one dimensional foot, but you get the point. I'm sorry if your typo wasn't as funny as my question regarding symmetry. ;-) Like I said, I've been meaning to try out the software application. Thanks. What typo? |
|
migf
New Member
Posts: 9 
|
Post by migf on Jun 15, 2017 23:35:05 GMT
Well, did you mean 1500 ft3?
|
|
|
|
Post by Hexspa on Jun 16, 2017 1:37:15 GMT
Well, did you mean 1500 ft3? Is 1500ft3 not valid? |
|
migf
New Member
Posts: 9
|
Post by migf on Jun 16, 2017 13:30:04 GMT
Naturally. Is it what you meant?
|
|
migf
New Member
Posts: 9
|
Post by migf on Jun 16, 2017 16:18:43 GMT
I looked up cubic feet and I can see where I misinterpreted your comment. There is no typo at all, my mistake.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ethan Winer on Jun 19, 2017 17:50:38 GMT
The issue of symmetry is a good example. I can see how problematic it is to mix with such an imbalance, but I don’t see that much of a problem in recording on the corner, except, perhaps, for bass build-up Sure, recording is different than mixing. Even if you were recording something in stereo, lack of symmetry s not necessarily a problem. Some years ago I recorded a CD for Music Minus One of cello and piano. I purposely used two different microphone types on the cello, not in an X/Y or related position. It still sounded great panned out left and right. Now, when recording an orchestra on a stage I'd aim for symmetry! But for one-off overdubs etc that's not a requirement. |
|
migf
New Member
Posts: 9
|
Post by migf on Jun 19, 2017 18:44:08 GMT
Actually, I was reading your FAQ the other day and noticed you mention a recording that your cello teacher made while standing with her back against a corner. I guess that it being mono alone would make it a non-issue.  |
|
